In today’s column , George Weigel explains that religious freedom should be a primary concern of American foreign policy. Not only is this a question of the first human freedom, it makes pragmatic sense for Washington: Religious freedom advances the cause of peace, for countries that violate the first freedom internally are, in the main, countries whose internal stability, economic policies, and foreign policies are of substantial concern to the United States.
But U.S. policy has achieved little in this arena:
The U.S. approach to international religious freedom is largely rhetorical: annual reports are issued, speeches are made, lists of egregious persecutors are published. None of this, however, has much effect on the persecutors.
That, in turn, suggests another structural reason why the effort to promote religious freedom internationally, mandated by Congress, hasnt worked: it hasnt been thought through strategically. Or as Farr put it, forbearing to mince words, no president or secretary of state has made a concerted, sustained effort to integrate the advancement of religious freedom into the foreign policy of the United States since the International Religious Freedom Act was passed in 1998.
Read the full On the Square here .
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?