You know that interview Pope Francis gave to Eugenio Scalfari of the Italian newspaper, La Repubblica ? The one in which the pope made some puzzling comments about conscience and proselytism? The one that so many people, including me , have been poring over for insights into the popes thoughts on religion, politics, and law? It turns out its not an interview at all, but an after-the-fact reconstruction. Apparently, Scalfari neither tape-recorded his interview nor took notes at the time. Some errors have already begun to emerge. The Vatican has confirmed the basic trustworthiness of the interviewwhatever that means. But, John Allen writes :
None of this, of course, is to excuse La Repubblica ‘s sloppiness in not making clear to readers that what was being presented as the literal words of the pope was actually a reconstruction, not a transcript.
Barring further clarification from the Vatican, its now impossible to cite any particular lines or formulae from that interview and attribute them directly to the pope, since we dont know quite where Scalfari ends and Francis begins.
Oh, well, never mind, then.
Is this any way to run a newspaper?
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?