David Schaengolds excellent observations about the modern skyscraper continue to draw well-deserved attention. Rod Dreher is the latest to chime in , touting the cathedral as the superior to the cold and forbidding beauty of the modern skyscraper:
Still, I think Schaengold is on the mark here, in the way he writes about the skyscraper and the observation deck. Its only that I see it as a defeat for humanity, even though its a triumph for science and engineering. They cant build churches that look worth a damn anymore either, not these days. If you live in New York and want to know how alien to any human thing a modern church can be, go by the small church of St. John the Evangelist in the Archdiocese of New York headquarters and poke your head in. It belongs in a skyscraper, or in Princess Leias palace.
To deploy a post-modern (or better, late-modern) line of inquiry, the difference between the medieval cathedral and the modern observation deck is not only whats observed, but the perspective of the observer.
Im a terrible student of architecture, so Im overstepping my limitations here. But it strikes me that whats at stake with the skyscraper is not the joy of observation per se, which we could gain just as easily from considering the lilies of the field. Its the inherent sense of triumph of observing from 13,000 feet, and gaining a perspective on the world without effort that our ancestors only dreamed of.
For the warning about this perspective, though, I naturally turn to Chesterton, the last true medieval:
Look at that blacksmith, for instance, went on Father Brown calmly; a good man, but not a Christianhard, imperious, unforgiving. Well, his Scotch religion was made up by men who prayed on hills and high crags, and learnt to look down on the world more than to look up at heaven. Humility is the mother of giants. One sees great things from the valley; only small things from the peak.
Rather than the observation deck as the quintessential expression of the modern joy of observation, then, I would propose the sidewalk. When done well, it provides a safe, clean, and social path for loitering, lingering, and generally ogling the greatnessand depravityof the modern skyscraper.
While I have you, can I ask you something? I’ll be quick.
Twenty-five thousand people subscribe to First Things. Why can’t that be fifty thousand? Three million people read First Things online like you are right now. Why can’t that be four million?
Let’s stop saying “can’t.” Because it can. And your year-end gift of just $50, $100, or even $250 or more will make it possible.
How much would you give to introduce just one new person to First Things? What about ten people, or even a hundred? That’s the power of your charitable support.
Make your year-end gift now using this secure link or the button below.