Because I really, really like this latest Ross Douthat column skewering Ivy League monopolism/elitism .
His excuse for commenting comes from the silly dust-up over the Susan Patton letter advising young Princeton women to take their dating possibilities for finding a good husband during their four years seriously, advice that, when applied to most any decent college, is actually fairly sensible compared to the normal lack-of-marriage-advice or bad feminist advice young collegiate women usually get these days. Jane Austen would basically approve, although she would also advise such women to find more opportunities to meet slightly older men, at least the more-established ones.
We can debate the Patton letter if you want, sure, but the real Nixon-esque action is to be found in what Douthat does with it. Hes unfair to Patton by representing her advice as being less about marriage generally than about how a wise Princeton lass stays within the elite class, but with riffs like the following, I do believe I can forgive him:
. . . Why, it would be like telling elite collegians that they should all move to similar cities and neighborhoods, surround themselves with their kinds of people and gradually price everybody else out of the places where social capital is built, influence exerted and great careers made. No need thats what were already doing!
. . . The holistic approach to admissions, which privileges résumé-padding and extracurriculars over raw test scores or G.P.A.s, has two major consequences: it enforces what looks suspiciously like de facto discrimination against Asian applicants with high SAT scores, while disadvantaging talented kids often white and working class and geographically dispersed who dont grow up in elite enclaves with parents and friends who understand the system. The result is an upper class that looks superficially like America, but mostly reproduces the previous generations elite.
. . . But dont come out and say it! Next people will start wondering . . . why in a country of 300 million people and countless universities, we cant seem to elect a president or nominate a Supreme Court justice who doesnt have a Harvard or Yale degree.
Nixon was right about some things, you know.
We launched the First Things 2023 Year-End Campaign to keep articles like the one you just read free of charge to everyone.
Measured in dollars and cents, this doesn't make sense. But consider who is able to read First Things: pastors and priests, college students and professors, young professionals and families. Last year, we had more than three million unique readers on firstthings.com.
Informing and inspiring these people is why First Things doesn't only think in terms of dollars and cents. And it's why we urgently need your year-end support.
Will you give today?