The Way Forward After June Medical
by O. Carter SneadJune Medical Services v. Russo was a grave disappointment and a missed opportunity. But now is not the moment to dwell on anger. Continue Reading »
June Medical Services v. Russo was a grave disappointment and a missed opportunity. But now is not the moment to dwell on anger. Continue Reading »
The Espinoza v. Montana ruling is the latest step in a decades-long doctrinal evolution that is as striking as it is welcome. Continue Reading »
Bostock’s metaphysical assumptions will further undermine the “binary” character of sex, as they have for the larger “gender identity” movement. Continue Reading »
Douglas Farrow’s Theological Negotiations takes the reader to the very heart of our cultural confusions. Continue Reading »
The effects of Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC will ripple out widely in our country, touching and disfiguring our private lives. Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County gives the LGBT movement a powerful bulldozer with which to demolish all public expressions of dissent from its agenda. Continue Reading »
The Little Sisters of the Poor are in a Supreme Court sequel because of “progressive” politicians’ unrelenting opposition to any religious exercise that might complicate their vision of the good life. Continue Reading »
It would be dangerous to give the powerful gay lobby the weapons of anti-discrimination law. Continue Reading »
Pro-lifers are not hoping for too much from the Supreme Court in June Medical Services v. Gee. Continue Reading »
The machine of contemporary civil rights law and activism grinds very finely, and without regard to social realities. Continue Reading »