Mamet’s Map and NetChoice v. Paxton
by Philip HamburgerNetChoice v. Paxton is a case about government-orchestrated censorship that will decide the fate of free speech in this country. Continue Reading »
NetChoice v. Paxton is a case about government-orchestrated censorship that will decide the fate of free speech in this country. Continue Reading »
Amul Thapar joins the podcast to discuss his new book, The People's Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him. Continue Reading »
Liel Leibovitz’s article “Fight Together, Win Together” (December 2023) is a stirring encapsulation of the dark side, so to speak, of intersectionality’s ideological ascendancy within western academic institutions. Two questions stand out to me after reading the piece. Several groups of . . . . Continue Reading »
Thomas F. Powers joins the podcast to discuss his book American Multiculturalism and the Anti-Discrimination Regime. Continue Reading »
The purpose of my book Mere Natural Law was to bring natural law down out of the clouds, to show how it bears in very precise and concrete ways on such matters as the regulation of speech. Continue Reading »
So-called “window bills,” which eliminate statutes of limitations on child sexual abuse claims for periods of two or three years, have been enacted in more than seventeen states. Their primary justification—the thesis that victims of child sexual abuse are psychologically constrained from . . . . Continue Reading »
C. S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity famously begins with vignettes of ordinary experience. People of all ages and levels of education, Lewis observes, often say things like: “How’d you like it if anyone did the same to you?” “That’s my seat, I was there first,” “Leave him . . . . Continue Reading »
John Moran joins the podcast to discuss a recently rejected Australian referendum that proposed special representation for indigenous people in government. Continue Reading »
The very telos of any Constitution would be to protect those rights that flow to us by nature. Continue Reading »
“The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives.” It is now one year, . . . . Continue Reading »