In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court created a constitutional right of some human beings to kill other human beings. Specifically, the Court held that the Constitution of the United States creates a substantive individual liberty to procure or perform an abortion of a human . . . . Continue Reading »
Let me offer a prediction, free of any face-saving hedge: Next year, the Supreme Court will hold that there is no constitutional right to elective abortions. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case pending before the court, it will return the issue to the states for the . . . . Continue Reading »
By the time procedurally adequate litigation is launched under S.B. 8, many unborn Texan lives will have been spared. That is a beautiful thing, and pro-lifers around the nation should be pleased. Continue Reading »
David Lloyd Dusenbury joins the podcast to discuss his new book, The Innocence of Pontius Pilate: How the Roman Trial of Jesus Shaped History. Continue Reading »
Using Dobbs to overturn Roe will move our society slightly closer to a more accurate understanding of what it means to be human. Continue Reading »
Lynn Fitch has strongly condemned Roe and Casey, deferring to the Constitution rather than flawed judicial precedent. Continue Reading »
The Court has declined to review Arlene’s Flowers despite hopes that the Trump-appointed justices would spur the Court to take on lingering First-Amendment questions. Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court's decision not to hear Grimm leaves untouched bad law concerning transgender rights. Continue Reading »
Roe must go. It is morally and, more to the point for the Court, constitutionally indefensible—and has been from the moment it was handed down. Continue Reading »
Fulton is a victory f0r religious liberty, but, given the fact-specific nature of the case, it might not be as concrete or influential as some might hope. Continue Reading »
Subscribe
Latest Issue
Support First Things
