Ask a pro-life activist what he or she hopes to accomplish, and you’re likely to hear that the law should protect unborn human life in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Ask a pro-choice activist the same question, and you’re likely to hear . . . . Continue Reading »
We have no “constitutional crisis.” We have no “normative crisis.” One could, however, make the case that we have a “credibility crisis.” Continue Reading »
Amy Coney Barrett has not had her soul shaped by the places and people governed by the dominant liberal ethos of our age. Continue Reading »
The warmth and compassion that Judge Barrett has shown me on so many occasions flow from the same wellspring of faith for which she is now so excoriated. Continue Reading »
America evaluates judicial nominees under three criteria—legal credentials, judicial philosophy, and personal character—and Barrett passes each criterion with flying colors. Continue Reading »
With the official right to abolition our human nature inscribed in law in Bostock, we have all become slaves of our own “freedom.” Continue Reading »
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which incorporates sexual orientation and gender identity into Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, is a victory for gay rights advocates and entrenches gender ideology into civil rights law. Many are asking about its implications . . . . Continue Reading »
The contemporary crisis of Western civilization is fundamentally a crisis in the idea of the human person. Continue Reading »
Bostock struck at the very root of the law in denying the necessary way in which human beings by nature must be constituted. Continue Reading »
This Term, both progressives and the traditionally religious can claim victories in the debate over sexuality, gender, and equality. Continue Reading »
Subscribe
Latest Issue
Support First Things
